Trial reportBMC surgery2025
Integrating tactile simulation into thoracic surgery education: a Miller's pyramid-Based study.
Trial report in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate intraoperative localization of pulmonary nodules remains a significant challenge in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), especially for small, deep, or subsolid lesions. This prospective cohort study evaluated the impact of a simulation-based training program using high-fidelity 3D-printed lung models on surgical trainees' spatial-tactile localization skills. A total of 67 postgraduate year 1-2 trainees were randomized into a lung model group (LMG) or a control group (CG). The curriculum comprised four sequential phases aligned with Miller's Pyramid: anatomical instruction, CT-to-anatomy mapping, thoracoscopic simulated localization, and intraoperative localization. Participants in the LMG achieved significantly higher scores in radiologic-anatomic mapping (6.94 ± 1.07 vs. 5.82 ± 1.07; p < 0.001) and simulated localization (2.09 ± 0.71 vs. 1.45 ± 0.87; p = 0.002). In clinical procedures, LMG trainees had a higher localization success rate (68.97%) compared to CG (66.67%), though not statistically significant (p = 0.877). Self-reported confidence and satisfaction ratings consistently favored the LMG. These findings suggest that anatomically realistic, simulation-based tactile training enhances thoracic surgery trainees' ability to mentally integrate radiologic data with intraoperative spatial reasoning. Incorporating such structured modules into thoracic surgical education may improve operative readiness and reduce reliance on adjunctive localization technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.