Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174717›Full record

ReviewGenomics & informatics2025

From pixels to cell types: a comprehensive review of computational methods for spatial transcriptomics deconvolution.

Jahanzeb Saqib, Junil Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genomics & informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jahanzeb SaqibDepartment of Bioinformatics, Soongsil University, 369 Sangdo-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06978, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-6954
Junil KimDepartment of Bioinformatics, Soongsil University, 369 Sangdo-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06978, Republic of Korea. junilkim@ssu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1202-1808

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea RS-2025-02263724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics technologies have significantly enhanced the analysis of gene expression profiles by retaining the spatial information of intact tissue sections and enabling the possibility of a more profound comprehension of tissue structures and cellular relationships. Despite this, most platforms have limited resolution, and at numerous capture spots, multiple signals from various cells are present, requiring deconvolution, a set of computational steps to deduce the underlying cellular composition. Over the last few years, a range of algorithms has been proposed to address this problem, each employing distinct computational principles and processing paradigms. The present review seeks to present a comprehensive analysis of twenty such algorithms, focusing on their methodological foundations. We contrast the underlying computational algorithms, modeling methods, and data processing pipelines that underlie them, and how they deal with external references, noise and sparsity in the data. By drawing out the conceptual as well as technical foundations of each algorithm, we aim to provide researchers a complete and hands-on grasp of the computational landscape of spatial transcriptomics deconvolution. This review is a methodological handbook to enable deep understanding of current deconvolution methods to develop novel strategies and help in selecting or applying these existing tools for different biological contexts.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceCell type deconvolutionDeconvolution algorithmsDeep learningGraph-based modelingNon-negative matrix factorization (NMF)Probabilistic modelingSingle cell RNA-seqSpatial transcriptomicsTransformer based models

Identifiers

PMID41174717
PMCPMC12577344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.