ArticleBMC nursing2025
Comparing core competencies for diabetes specialist nurses across different countries: a scoping review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inferior metabolic control in isolated diabetic patients under the context of multimorbidity management: a comparative study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis review aims to identify the current status of the core competencies of Diabetes Specialist Nurses (DSNs) as referenced in available international literature. It identifies specific categories and important components of the core competencies identified internationally, which lacks attention for now.
methodsA scoping review was conducted using electronic databases including CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The latest Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review methodology was aligned with.
resultsAfter initial analysis, 27 competencies were extracted from 11 studies, and then categorized into eight domains: Diabetes professional knowledge, Supporting self-management, Clinical Management Practice and Integration, Administration and research, Professional technique, Complication care, Teaching and learning, and Cultural Competence. The PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was applied.
conclusionsThe compilation of the currently identified core competencies for DSNs, coupled with an analysis of the core competency standards in the assessment of these professionals, can contribute to facilitate the establishment of a uniform standard of professionalism in the delivery of diabetes care on a global scale. This would facilitate the development of an internationally applicable core competency framework for DSNs. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.