ArticleBMC oral health2025
Genetic and environmental determinants of dental fluorosis: a case‒control study of DLX3, ESR1, and ESR2 variants in a high-fluoride region of Mexico.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CFTR and ClC-3 Transport Fluoride Differently and Cause Dental Fluorosis in Different Ways.Biomolecules · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental fluorosis (DF) is a condition caused by prolonged fluoride (F) exposure during tooth development, leading to enamel changes. Clinically, it presents as opaque white spots and, in severe cases, striations, mottling, or enamel loss. Although chronic fluoride exposure is the main factor, severity does not always align with fluoride levels, suggesting genetic influences, such as variants in the DLX3, ESR1 and ESR2 genes, which regulate tooth development. This cross-sectional case-control study included 79 women from Durango, Mexico. The severity of dental fluorosis was assessed across the entire mouth via the Thylstrup-Fejerskov Index (TFI), with the highest score recorded for evaluation. The classification followed the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines from Geneva, 1997, categorizing severity into mild, moderate, and severe groups. The fluoride concentrations in the water and urine were quantified via potentiometry. Genotyping was conducted via real-time PCR. The average concentration of fluoride (ppm) was 5.38(± 2.73 SD) for tap water, 4.79±(4.60 SD) for urine and 2.32(± 2.78 SD) for drinking water TFI followed the next distribution: 72.1% of the participants had moderate, 22.7% had mild, and 5.2% had severe fluorosis. A positive correlation between F in drinking water and F in urine. (0.46, p = 0.001) and a negative correlation between F in drinking water and the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (-0.41, p = 0.01) was found. Additionally, a significant association was identified between the recessive model of the rs2278163 DLX3 and rs12154178 ESR1 polymorphisms and mild and moderate fluorosis (p = 0.02, OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.88 and p = 0.034, OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10-0.95, respectively).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.