Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174652›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Gender differences in institutional trust and covid-19 vaccines uptake in Ghana.

Irenius Konkor, Florence Dery, Ebenezer Dassah, Elijah Bisung, Vincent Kuuire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irenius KonkorDepartment of Geography, Geomatics and Environment, University of Toronto Mississauga, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Florence DeryDepartment of Africana Studies, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Ebenezer DassahSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. edassah10@knust.edu.gh.
Elijah BisungSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Vincent KuuireDepartment of Geography, Geomatics and Environment, University of Toronto Mississauga, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most studied social phenomena since the emergence of the covid-19 pandemic is trust. This renewed interest demonstrates the crucial role of trust in crises management. Unfortunately, most of the studies on trust have been conducted without considerations to saliant social categorisations like gender that might matter on how trust is built and radiated. This is despite differing socialisations of gender values in social contexts and how that might translate into how trust is built and demonstrated. The goal of this study, therefore, was to examine prevailing gendered patterns of institutional trust and how that might translate into the uptake of covid-19 vaccines in Ghana. We conducted logistic regression analyses on a sample of 1692 individual responses from a cross-sectional survey that was collected between October and November 2022 across four cities in Ghana. Results show that women were more trusting and were consequently more likely to take the vaccine in comparison to men. Interaction analysis further revealed that even when both men and women trusted a lot in relevant institutions like health, women were about 64% more likely to take the vaccine in comparison to men. Only men were significantly less likely to take the vaccine if they had trust concerns with political institutions. But both men and women were less likely to take the vaccine if they had trust concerns with health institutions. This study underscores the need for gender-specific policy programmes on public health issues.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CareTrustAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsCOVID-19 VaccinesCovid-19GenderGhanaInstitutional trustSocial categorisationVaccines uptake

Identifiers

PMID41174652
PMCPMC12577024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.