ArticleBMC oral health2025
Skel-Net: automatic prediction of skeletal pattern on scanned lateral cephalograms using anatomical prior-guided deep learning network.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstimating craniofacial patterns is essential for successful orthodontic treatment. However, conventional static measurements are inadequate for capturing dynamic changes, and manual cephalometric analysis is labor-intensive and requires specialized expertise. In this study, we propose Skel-Net, a novel anatomic prior-guided deep learning network designed to estimate ANB angle changes over five years in children and adolescents aged 8-16.
methodsIn a two-stage approach, Skel-Net combines cephalometric landmark detection via Ceph-Net and multichannel inputs, including two-dimensional heatmaps and ANB priors, to enhance prediction accuracy. A dataset of 612 lateral cephalograms from 245 patients was used to train and validate the model, and its performance was compared against DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, ResNet101, and VGG16.
resultsSkel-Net outperformed the other models with the lowest prediction errors (mean absolute error: 1.021 degrees; root mean squared error: 1.338 degrees) and the highest R
conclusionsBy leveraging anatomic priors and longitudinal data, Skel-Net enables dynamic and personalized predictions of craniofacial growth. This framework will facilitate early and precise orthodontic interventions, enhancing treatment efficiency, stability, and overall patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.