Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174617›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Joint explainable and fair AI in healthcare.

Reza Shahbazian, Irina Trubitsyna, Seyedeh Leili Mirtaheri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reza ShahbazianDepartment of Computer Engineering, Modeling, Electronics and Systems (DIMES), University of Calabria, Rende, 87036, Italy.
Irina TrubitsynaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Modeling, Electronics and Systems (DIMES), University of Calabria, Rende, 87036, Italy. i.trubitsyna@dimes.unical.it.
Seyedeh Leili MirtaheriDepartment of Computer Engineering, Modeling, Electronics and Systems (DIMES), University of Calabria, Rende, 87036, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nature of decisions in the healthcare domain necessitates accurate, interpretable, and reliable AI solutions. Explanation Guided Learning (EGL) explores the integration of explanation annotations into learning models to align human and model explanations. In this paper, we propose Explanation Constraints Guided Learning (ECGL), a novel approach inspired by the augmented Lagrangian method that integrates domain-specific explanation constraints directly into model training. The goal is to enhance both predictive accuracy and interpretability, making machine learning models more trustworthy. Experimental results on both tabular and image datasets demonstrate that ECGL maintains high accuracy while incorporating fairness and interpretability constraints. Specifically, ECGL improves predictive accuracy on the diabetes dataset compared to the base model and enhances feature alignment, with SHAP analysis. On average, a 36.8% increase in SHAP importance demonstrates that ECGL effectively aligns model explanations with domain knowledge. Furthermore, ECGL improves the identification of clinically significant regions in pneumonia X-ray images, as validated by both improved Equalized Odds Ratio (EOR) and GradCAM visualizations. ECGL achieves a 13% improvement in the EOR fairness metric, indicating better consistency of predictive performance across different groups. These results confirm that ECGL successfully balances performance, fairness, and interpretability, positioning it as a promising approach for trustworthy healthcare AI applications.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedical InformaticsHumansArtificial intelligenceAugmented lagrangianExplainable guided learning (EGL)FairnessHealthcare

Identifiers

PMID41174617
PMCPMC12577397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.