ArticleBMC nursing2025
First encounters with mortality: a qualitative study of novice nurses' experiences with a patient's death under their care in Iran.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Latent profiles of death coping competence among nursing interns and associations with death attitudes, death exposure, and death education; a cross-sectional survey.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient death is an inescapable and emotionally demanding reality in nursing, frequently causing significant stress, particularly for novice nurses. Their limited experience often leaves them psychologically vulnerable to the distress associated with patient mortality and unprepared for sensitive end-of-life communication. Existing research predominantly focuses on experienced nurses, leaving a gap in understanding the unique challenges faced by novice nurses, especially within culturally distinct contexts like Iran, where cultural and religious frameworks profoundly shape grief and death perceptions. This qualitative study aimed to deeply explore the experiences of novice Iranian nurses when encountering patient death in clinical practice.
methodsA qualitative content analysis, guided by Graneheim and Lundman (2004), was used. Twenty novice nurses (less than 36 months clinical experience) were purposively recruited from Iranian hospitals. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Transcribed interviews underwent rigorous analysis: identifying meaning units, condensation, coding, categorization, and theme development. MAXQDA 2020 facilitated the process. Trustworthiness was ensured via credibility (member checking), dependability (audit trail), confirmability (team discussions), and transferability (thick description).
resultsThe analysis revealed a significant disconnect between the nurses' intense personal experiences and the lack of institutional support. Six major themes emerged, detailing their journey from the initial Emotional Turmoil and grappling with Ethical Paradoxes, to identifying significant Systemic Gaps in support and education. This journey prompted a challenging Professional Transformation, forcing nurses to engage in Cultural-Spiritual Meaning-Making and a personal search for Seeking Balance.
conclusionNovice nurses are left to navigate the trauma of patient death within a system that fails to adequately prepare or support them. The findings highlight an urgent need for healthcare organizations to implement structured support, such as mandatory debriefing and ethics consultations, and for nursing curricula to integrate practical, high-fidelity training in end-of-life care. Supporting novice nurses is essential for fostering resilience, ensuring compassionate care, and strengthening the nursing profession. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.