ArticleBMC neurology2025
Endovascular treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage - an international survey.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a major cause of morbidity after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Endovascular treatment (ET) has emerged as a rescue strategy, but its optimal timing, indication, and modality remain unclear. This study assessed international ET practices, focusing on treatment variability and clinical decision-making.
methodsA 25-question survey was developed with input from specialists in interventional neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurology, and neurocritical care. It was disseminated via professional societies to physicians involved in bedside decisions. Respondents reviewed clinical scenarios representing common DCI presentations, including proximal/distal vasospasm and conscious/unconscious patients. Descriptive analysis was performed.
results179 respondents from 38 countries participated; 76.5% reported ET availability at their institution. The most common strategy was single or repeated intra-arterial spasmolysis (76.5%), followed by continuous intra-arterial vasodilator infusion (23.0%). In unconscious patients, 50% applied spasmolysis as first-line treatment. For refractory proximal vasospasm, a stepwise approach was preferred, starting with intra-arterial pharmacologic spasmolysis, then angioplasty. While angioplasty was widely used, 66.5% considered it riskier than spasmolysis.
conclusionThis survey highlights marked variability in ET practices for DCI. Intra-arterial spasmolysis is the predominant strategy, with alternative approaches like continuous infusion and angioplasty also in use. These findings underscore the need for randomized trials to define optimal ET strategies and inform evidence-based protocols for DCI following SAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.