Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174565›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Mission and money: A scoping review of social enterprise business models as a solution to sustaining health-promoting food and nutrition-based initiatives.

Leila I Fathi, Jacqueline Walker, Clare Dix, Josephine Previte, Dilara Olgacher, Jayne Woodside, Helen Truby

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leila I FathiSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Human Movement Studies Building, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4067, Australia.
Jacqueline WalkerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Human Movement Studies Building, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4067, Australia.
Clare DixSchool of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, Moreton Bay, QLD, 4502, Australia.
Josephine PreviteBusiness School, The University of Queensland, Colin Clark, 39 Blair Dr, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4067, Australia.
Dilara OlgacherCentre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences A, Queen's University Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT12 6BJ, United Kingdom.
Jayne WoodsideCentre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences A, Queen's University Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT12 6BJ, United Kingdom. j.woodside@qub.ac.uk.
Helen TrubySchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Human Movement Studies Building, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4067, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost food and nutrition-based interventions are abandoned within two years of implementation due to a lack of secure long-term funding and political volatilities. Social enterprise structures are a potential solution to this problem due to their ability to generate profit and impact social outcomes. Therefore, this scoping review sought to explore what social enterprise models exist that address food and nutrition-based outcomes, and the factors that contribute to their long-term financial and operational sustainability.

methodsScoping review methodology was utilised, with cross-checking currency of the social enterprise via Google (July, 2024). Eight search engines were explored, generating 2502 publications. Twenty-eight (20 case studies, 1 cross-sectional study, 6 evaluations and 1 quasi-experimental) studies were entered into a narrative synthesis.

resultsEight different operational models from 13 countries were identified: social cooperative; employment; targeted customer service; beneficiary service; market intermediary; social partnership; trading business; and social business. The most utilised model was the targeted customer service. The average duration of the enterprises was 16.5 years, showcasing that sustainable models that continue to deliver on social impact can have longevity.

conclusionsSocial enterprises that adopt a business model from the outset are capable of generating income, whilst offering solutions to delivering on and sustaining food or nutrition-based outcomes within communities. There are several business models, though different, that have proven to have longevity. These models enable profit and social purpose to co-exist, benefiting the communities they serve.

Indexed as

CommerceHealth PromotionModels, OrganizationalHumansCommunityEntrepreneurshipFoodHealth promotionNutritionPublic health nutritionSocial enterprise

Identifiers

PMID41174565
PMCPMC12577109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.