ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
A novel modality contribution confidence-enhanced multimodal deep learning framework for multiomics data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SlideMamba: entropy-based adaptive fusion of GNN and Mamba for enhanced representation learning in digital pathology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodal learning for classification tasks has recently gained significant attention in bioinformatics. Current approaches primarily concentrate on devising efficient deep learning architectures to capture features within and across modalities. However, they typically assume that each modality contributes equally to the classification objective, overlooking inherent biases within multimodal learning. This paper presents a modality contribution confidence-enhanced deep learning framework to address this issue, resulting in an improved fusion space and improved classification performance on multiomics data. Specifically, we propose utilising a non-parametric Gaussian Process to assess the unimodal confidence of each modality and learn within-modality features. Additionally, we introduce the use of the Kullback-Leibler divergence to align multiple modalities and learn cross-modality features. Extensive experiments on four multiomics datasets, incorporating modalities such as static information, DNA, mRNA, miRNA, and protein data, validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Furthermore, a case study on the blister recovery task is included to demonstrate the practical utility of our model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.