Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174550›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

A study of the relationship between mutual aid and the mental health of older people.

Xiaohan Liu, Li Zheng, Min Li, Bin Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaohan LiuSchool of Management, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou City, 221004, China.
Li ZhengSchool of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou City, 221004, China.
Min LiSchool of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou City, 221004, China.
Bin HuSchool of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou City, 221004, China. hubin@xzhmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFocusing on the mental health of older people is of great significance to the implementation of a healthy China.

methodsBased on individual-level tracking data from China (CHARLS) in 2013, 2015, 2018, and 2020, a quantitative study was conducted on the implementation of the mutual aid for older people policy and the mental health of older people using the DID double difference model.

resultsThe study demonstrated that the implementation of mutual aid for older people care policies is significantly positively correlated with improvements in older people depression and mental health levels (p <0.01), with an estimated effect size of approximately 3.87%. Heterogeneity analysis revealed that this positive association varied across different groups: the strength of the correlation was higher among older people with disabilities than among healthy older people, and the association was stronger among males than among females.

conclusionsThe government should strengthen the top-level design of mutual aid-based older people care; At the social level, diverse resources should be connected to build a mutual aid platform for older people care; Community organizations should innovate service models and improve space creation; Family unit should strengthen internal support and improve emotional communication.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAgedAged, 80 and overChinaDepressionFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMaleMiddle AgedDIDmental healthmutual aid for older peopleolder peoplePSM

Identifiers

PMID41174550
PMCPMC12576993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.