Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174481›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

"It's hard to trust an individual, it's easier to trust an image"-patients with low back pain want imaging as a means of coping with uncertainty.

Lynn Haslam-Larmer, Kathleen E Norman, Andrea M Patey, Isabella M Thomas, Michael E Green, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Jill A Hayden, Jan Hartvigsen, Noah M Ivers, Hazel Jenkins and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lynn Haslam-LarmerQueen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Kathleen E NormanQueen's University, Kingston, Canada. kathleen.norman@queensu.ca.
Andrea M PateyDepartment of Medicine, Quality and Safety, IWK Health, Halifax, Canada.
Isabella M ThomasQueen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Michael E GreenNOSM University, Sudbury, Canada.
Jeremy M GrimshawOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Jill A HaydenDepartment of Community Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Jan HartvigsenCenter for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Noah M IversUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Hazel JenkinsMacquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Simon D FrenchQueen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Funding

CIHR FRN 153164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based guidelines for low back pain recommend against routine imaging. Despite these guidelines, many patients still seek imaging. We sought to understand why patients with low back pain may want imaging, using a qualitative approach grounded in the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model (CSSRM), a model that frames how patients' beliefs and actions are shaped by their past experiences and understanding of an illness.

methodsWe interviewed 28 patients from a larger study in Ontario, Canada. Participants were recruited by family physicians (n = 8), chiropractors (n = 10), and physiotherapists (n = 10), and most (82.1%) had previous episodes of low back pain. Participants completed intake questionnaires and semi-structured interviews that explored their experiences with low back pain care and perspectives on imaging. We analyzed the interview transcripts using the CSSRM.

resultsThe CSSRM domains were represented in patients' narratives: Stimuli and Illness Representations, Coping Procedures, and Appraisal of Outcomes. Within Stimuli and Representations, patients described perceptions of the causes of their pain, and they associated obtaining an image with gaining a sense of control over their diagnosis. Within Coping Procedures, Cognitive Reappraisal emerged as the construct with the most discourse, reflecting how patients interpreted and reassessed their low back pain over time. Many patients expressed the belief that imaging would resolve uncertainty, validate their experience, and confirm that nothing serious had been overlooked. Patients emphasized that imaging would "show what's going on," or help them "feel taken seriously". Within Appraisal of Outcomes, patients described the self-limiting nature of their LBP; the limited discourse about emotional outcomes was often linked to frustrations and fears. The beliefs expressed in interviews were not consistent with participants' questionnaire answers from months previously, suggesting that beliefs may shift over time.

conclusionsMany patients believed imaging for low back pain was important to gain certainty in diagnosis and reassurance that treatment was appropriate. However, their beliefs about the value of imaging may not be stable over time, as they are influenced by ongoing experiences and reappraisals. To reduce unwarranted imaging, clinicians should consider providing consistent and contextualized messaging that meets the patient's ongoing illness experience.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalLow Back PainTrustAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOntarioQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUncertaintyCommon-Sense Self-Regulation ModelImagingLow back painPatient perspectives

Identifiers

PMID41174481
PMCPMC12576980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.