Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174332›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2025

Doomscrolling and Secondary Traumatic Stress: Psychological Distress and Just World Belief as Potential Mediating Pathways.

Chin-Siang Ang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chin-Siang AngSchool of Psychology, TMC Academy, 805 Geylang Road, Singapore, 389683, Singapore. austin_ang119@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1868-7827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doomscrolling, the repetitive consumption of distressing online content, has been linked to heightened emotional strain, yet the psychological processes that may underlie its association with trauma-like outcomes remain less understood. This study examined whether psychological distress and general belief in a just world (GBJW) function as intermediary mechanisms in the association between doomscrolling and secondary traumatic stress symptoms associated with social media exposure (STS-SM). A cross-sectional sample of 235 adults in Singapore completed validated self-report measures assessing doomscrolling behavior, psychological distress, GBJW, and STS-SM. Regression-based mediation analyses indicated that psychological distress was associated with the link between doomscrolling and STS-SM, with indirect pathways observed across depression, anxiety, and stress subdomains. GBJW did not emerge as an independent mediator. However, a sequential pathway was observed: higher levels of doomscrolling were related to greater psychological distress, which was in turn was linked to variations in GBJW, and subsequently to STS-SM. These findings suggest that psychological distress may represent a proximal emotional process, whereas GBJW may function as a conditional cognitive resource mobilized in response to heightened strain. While the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference, the results highlight potential affective and cognitive pathways through which doomscrolling may be linked with trauma-like responses. Future longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to further clarify these mechanisms and to inform strategies for supporting psychological well-being in digitally saturated contexts.

Indexed as

DepressionDoomscrollingGeneral belief in a just worldPsychological distressSecondary traumatic stress

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.