Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174325›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Implementation of AI in radiology: the perspective of referring physicians.

Jennifer Gotta, Leon D Grünewald, Vitali Koch, Scherwin Mahmoudi, Simon Bernatz, Elena Höhne, Teodora Biciusca, Aynur Gökduman, Christian Wolfram, Christian Booz and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jennifer GottaGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Jennifer.Gotta@unimedizin-ffm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0524-6574
Leon D GrünewaldGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Vitali KochGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Scherwin MahmoudiGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Simon BernatzGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Elena HöhneGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Teodora BiciuscaGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Aynur GökdumanGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christian WolframGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christian BoozGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jan-Erik ScholtzGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Simon MartinGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Katrin EichlerGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Tatjana Gruber-RouhGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Andreas BucherGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ibrahim YelGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thomas J VoglGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Philipp ReschkeGoethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAI offers considerable potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in radiology. However, its successful implementation depends largely on the trust and acceptance of referring physicians. This study examines physicians' attitudes toward AI in radiology, identifying key facilitators and barriers to its clinical integration. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 169 licensed physicians in Germany, including surgeons, internists, and general practitioners who frequently refer patients to radiology, were surveyed. Participants were recruited via a systematic review of hospital and practice websites. A structured online questionnaire assessed perceptions of AI, focusing on trust-related factors, preferred applications, and adoption barriers. Statistical analysis was conducted using R and Python.

resultsOverall, 60% of respondents evaluated AI positively for enhancing diagnostic accuracy (mean score 3.7 ± 1.2). The most influential trust factor was model transparency (56.3%), followed by legal clarity on liability (25.0%) and strong data protection (11.7%). Transparency was rated significantly higher than other factors (p < 0.001). Preferred AI applications included lesion detection, research data analysis, and workflow management. Barriers to adoption included the "black box" nature of AI, unclear accountability, and data privacy concerns. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant variation in trust factors between specialties (p = 0.21).

conclusionPhysicians see AI as a promising tool in radiology but emphasize the need for greater transparency, clear legal responsibility, and secure data handling. Addressing these concerns through explainable AI models, legal frameworks, and robust data protection measures is essential for fostering trust and facilitating successful AI integration in clinical practice. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Understanding physicians' concerns about AI transparency, liability, and data privacy is essential. Addressing these barriers is critical to ensuring responsible implementation, building trust, and enabling effective integration of AI into clinical radiology workflows. KEY POINTS: AI acceptance in radiology faces transparency and liability concerns. Lesion detection and data analysis were rated most beneficial by physicians. Clear regulation and explainability are key for clinical AI trust.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceData privacyPhysician’s attitudesRadiology

Identifiers

PMID41174325
PMCPMC12579084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.