Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174287›Full record

Observational studyBritish journal of cancer2026

Molecular reflex testing in patients with early metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer within the PROMPT-study.

Iris S H Kloots, Peter H J Slootbeek, Sofie H Tolmeijer, Sandra van Wilpe, Minke Smits, Sjoerd van Helvert, Leonie I Kroeze, Jolique A van Ipenburg, Katrien Grünberg, C Marleen Kets and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04746300 (imPlementing ROutine Molecular Characterization in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant ProsTate Cancer by Next Generation DNA Sequencing), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04746300 unknown statusnot on this map

imPlementing ROutine Molecular Characterization in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant ProsTate Cancer by Next Generation DNA Sequencing (PROMPT-study)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2020 to 2025Enrolled400ConditionsMetastatic Prostate CancerArmsBiopsy, Blood sample
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Iris S H KlootsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9181-1359
Peter H J SlootbeekDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-919X
Sofie H TolmeijerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sandra van WilpeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Minke SmitsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd van HelvertDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Leonie I KroezeDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2666-1742
Jolique A van IpenburgDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Katrien GrünbergDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C Marleen KetsDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marjolijn J L LigtenbergDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1290-1474
James NagarajahDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jurgen FüttererDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joyce M van DodewaardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Meander medical centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Theo van VoorthuizenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Frederiek TerheggenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bravis Ziekenhuis, Roosendaal, The Netherlands.
Tineke J SmildeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Jack A SchalkenDepartment of Urology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-7797
Inge M van OortDepartment of Urology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Haiko J BloemendalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Winald R GerritsenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niven MehraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. niven.mehra@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4794-1831
PROMPT collaboration network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecision oncology using genotype-matched treatments (GMT) offers potential to improve survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PATIENT AND

methodsIn the PROMPT study (NCT04746300), reflex tumour testing through next-generation sequencing was performed in treatment-naïve or first-line mCRPC patients. All patients received a molecular tumour board (MTB) recommendation for GMT based on predefined druggable targets (DT). The main objective was to identify clinicopathological variables associated with DT.

resultsAnalysis included 340 tissue samples from 307 patients, 51% of samples were newly biopsied. Valid results were generated in 84% (76% new, 92% archived; P < 0.01). DT were identified in 39% of the patients, with PI3K-AKT (26%) and Homologous Recombination (HR; 21%) pathways most frequently affected. Metastatic tissue, especially from mCRPC setting (P < 0.01), yielded higher GMT recommendations than primary tissue (P = 0.03). HR-associated genes were linked with shorter ADT-to-CRPC time (OR 3.77, 95%CI 1.62-10.32, P < 0.01). PI3K-AKT alterations were associated with metachronous metastatic disease (OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.26-0.89, P = 0.021) and longer time to CRPC (OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.25-0.87, P = 0.017). No distinct variables predicted DT genotypes.

conclusionMolecular tumour testing should preferably be done on metastatic mCRPC tissue. No combination of features could robustly identify druggable genotypes; therefore, reflex molecular characterisation should be routine for every mCRPC patient.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAgedAged, 80 and overHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID41174287
PMCPMC12820098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.