Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174269›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026

The Science behind Probiotics: Exploring their Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.

Anita Entezami, Gholamreza Zarrini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Evaluation ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Potent Probiotic YeastACS omega · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anita EntezamiDepartment of Animal Biology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Gholamreza ZarriniDepartment of Animal Biology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Islamic Republic of Iran. zarrini@tabrizu.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term probiotic is defined as "a live microorganism which, when administered in adequate amounts, confers health benefits on the host." The genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are most frequently used as probiotics. Still, probiotic properties have also been reported for other species of genera such as Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Weissella, Streptococcus, as well as Saccharomyces, Bacillus, and Escherichia coli. Probiotics have significant potential for preventive or therapeutic applications in various diseases such as gastrointestinal disorders, urinary tract infections, allergic diseases, cancer, skin disorders, etc. Therefore, the exact mechanisms of how they work to enhance health and prevent various diseases need to be investigated. Several mechanisms of action have been suggested for probiotics, such as competitive exclusion, production of antimicrobial substances, enhancement of epithelial barrier function, immunomodulation, production of neurotransmitters, antioxidant effects, inhibition of virulence factor expression, and quorum sensing. Understanding these mechanisms provides critical and valuable insights for the development of new-generation probiotics with targeted therapeutic applications. Unlike previous studies that often focus on specific probiotic strains or limited mechanisms, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the multiple functional mechanisms by which probiotics exert their beneficial effects, as well as highlights some of their therapeutic applications. In addition to their mechanisms and beneficial effects, this article also addresses the challenges associated with probiotics, highlighting certain considerations that should be taken into account during their use.

Indexed as

ProbioticsAnimalsHumansLactobacillusFunctional mechanismsHealth benefitsLactic acid bacteriaProbiotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.