Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174265›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2025

Evaluation of the antinociceptive effect of NK-1 antagonist - maropitant, in different doses in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy - a prospective randomized clinical study.

Andressa Karollini E Silva, Marina Lopes Castro, Natália Fagundes, Raphael Rocha Wenceslau, Christina Malm, Felipe Gaia de Sousa, Cláudio Roberto Scabelo Mattoso, Suzane Lilian Beier

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andressa Karollini E SilvaDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, 6627 Antônio Carlos Av, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2872-2326
Marina Lopes CastroDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, 6627 Antônio Carlos Av, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0616-3559
Natália FagundesDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, 6627 Antônio Carlos Av, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2004-1972
Raphael Rocha WenceslauDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, 6627 Antônio Carlos Av, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-1484
Christina MalmDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, 6627 Antônio Carlos Av, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-0133
Felipe Gaia de SousaDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, 6627 Antônio Carlos Av, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil. fgaias@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5078-7820
Cláudio Roberto Scabelo MattosoDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, 6627 Antônio Carlos Av, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5592-9982
Suzane Lilian BeierDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, 6627 Antônio Carlos Av, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7352-5145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the antinociceptive effect of maropitant at different doses in female dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy to evaluate postoperative analgesic requirements. In total, 45 healthy female dogs were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 9). All groups were given morphine and acepromazine for premedication, followed by induction with propofol and maintenance with sevoflurane. The control group (CG) were given a continuous rate infusion (CRI) of 1 mL/kg/hour of physiological 0.9% saline. The treatment groups were, an intravenous (IV) bolus of 1 mg/kg/ maropitant followed by a CRI of 50 (G50), 75 (G75), 100 (G100), and 200 µg/kg/hour (G200). Heart and respiratory rate, invasive arterial blood pressure, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure, sevoflurane concentration, and temperature were evaluated. Rescue analgesia consisted of fentanyl, given when heart rate and blood pressure increased by > 20%. Postoperative pain was assessed by the Short Form Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale, and tramadol rescue analgesia was administered when the score was > 6. No significant differences in cardiorespiratory parameters, temperature or postoperative pain evaluation. Expired fraction of sevoflurane was significantly different between CG (2.11 ± 0.07), G50 (1.81 ± 0.07; p < 0.04) and G100 (1.81 ± 0.06; p < 0.03). Maropitant CRI administration during the perioperative period in female dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy showed efficacy in lowering the anesthetic requirements of sevoflurane in G50 and G100; however, it was not sufficient to suppress the autonomic response to somatic and visceral nociceptive stimulation and did not demonstrate any evident effect on pain evaluation.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsHysterectomyNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsOvariectomyPostoperative PainQuinuclidinesAnimalsDogsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleProspective StudiesAnalgesicsmaropitantNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsQuinuclidinesAnalgesiaAntiemeticsNeurokinin-1NociceptionPainReceptors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.