ArticleVeterinary research communications2025
Evaluation of the antinociceptive effect of NK-1 antagonist - maropitant, in different doses in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy - a prospective randomized clinical study.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the antinociceptive effect of maropitant at different doses in female dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy to evaluate postoperative analgesic requirements. In total, 45 healthy female dogs were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 9). All groups were given morphine and acepromazine for premedication, followed by induction with propofol and maintenance with sevoflurane. The control group (CG) were given a continuous rate infusion (CRI) of 1 mL/kg/hour of physiological 0.9% saline. The treatment groups were, an intravenous (IV) bolus of 1 mg/kg/ maropitant followed by a CRI of 50 (G50), 75 (G75), 100 (G100), and 200 µg/kg/hour (G200). Heart and respiratory rate, invasive arterial blood pressure, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure, sevoflurane concentration, and temperature were evaluated. Rescue analgesia consisted of fentanyl, given when heart rate and blood pressure increased by > 20%. Postoperative pain was assessed by the Short Form Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale, and tramadol rescue analgesia was administered when the score was > 6. No significant differences in cardiorespiratory parameters, temperature or postoperative pain evaluation. Expired fraction of sevoflurane was significantly different between CG (2.11 ± 0.07), G50 (1.81 ± 0.07; p < 0.04) and G100 (1.81 ± 0.06; p < 0.03). Maropitant CRI administration during the perioperative period in female dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy showed efficacy in lowering the anesthetic requirements of sevoflurane in G50 and G100; however, it was not sufficient to suppress the autonomic response to somatic and visceral nociceptive stimulation and did not demonstrate any evident effect on pain evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41174265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.