ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026
The human skin microbiome: factors affecting individuality and application in forensic investigations.
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forensic Microbiomics and Trace Microbial Evidence: Molecular Innovations for Linking Suspects, Objects, and Environments.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Plant-Derived Peptide-Polymer Therapeutics for Cutaneous Infections and Inflammation: Mechanistic Basis, Delivery Design and Translational Considerations.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Forensic applications of the skin microbiome: a structured narrative review of donor association, contact inference, and crime-scene reconstruction.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differences in microbial communities have been observed across various skin sites, such as dry, moist, and sebaceous areas. These skin types influence the diversity of microbials present in each microenvironment. Commonly found skin microbes include Staphylococcus epidermidis, Cutibacterium acnes and Corynebacterium sp. Ethnicity, age, gender and health status are a few individual-specific factors that shape the skin microbiome. Every individual retains unique and distinct skin microbial communities despite constant exposure to environmental changes. In forensic investigations, human identification can be achieved through skin microbial trace analysis left behind on surfaces and objects. Temporal stability of the microbial profile, on skin, for up to two weeks, is an attractive feature for the implementation of skin microbiome analysis in forensic applications. Additionally, microbial traces can assist in determining geolocation and estimating postmortem interval. Although high-throughput sequencing technologies have accelerated microbiome research and provide species-level information, the skin is a low-biomass sample, and there are currently no standardised protocols from sample collection to analysis. Machine learning is rapidly advancing skin microbiome research by enabling the analysis of large and complex datasets to uncover patterns. These patterns can be used for predicting skin health conditions, matching skin samples to specific microenvironments, identifying individuals and inferring biogeographic origins. The present review highlights current research in the application of skin microbiome analysis for forensics and future potential applications for age and gender determination. Additionally, the factors affecting the skin microbiome diversity are discussed. Skin microbiome research will accelerate enrichment of microbiome databases, which could complement the standard STR typing in accurate human identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.