ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Scalp cooling therapy in chemotherapy-induced alopecia: addressing variability in cooling duration and efficacy.
Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is a distressing side effect of cancer treatment with significant psychosocial consequences. Scalp cooling therapy (SCT) reduces the risk of CIA, but variability in pre- and post-infusion cooling durations limits its standardization and broader implementation. This review aims to examine current practices, identify factors contributing to variation, and explore strategies for optimizing SCT protocols.
methodsWe conducted a narrative review of published literature on SCT, including studies evaluating efficacy across chemotherapy regimens, SCT duration, patient factors such as hair type and race, and institutional barriers. We also reviewed studies assessing innovations aimed at reducing chair time and improving feasibility of SCT delivery in diverse clinical settings.
resultsPre-cooling durations typically range from 5-30 min, while post-cooling times vary from 15 min to 4 h, often without clear evidence for longer durations. Taxane-based regimens show higher hair preservation success compared to anthracyclines. Patient-specific factors (e.g., hair texture, race), staff availability, chair time, and equipment limitations all impact SCT implementation. Portable SCT systems and cooling stations outside the infusion chair have been proposed to improve workflow. Limited data suggest shorter post-cooling may be equally effective and better tolerated.
conclusionSCT is an effective intervention for CIA, but wide variation in implementation presents challenges. Standardizing cooling durations based on evidence and patient-centered considerations is essential to improve SCT access, patient satisfaction, and healthcare efficiency. Further research is needed to evaluate shortened protocols, portable systems, and pharmacologic adjuncts that may enhance the feasibility and effectiveness of SCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.