Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174219›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Symmetric bug prediction in software requirement by machine learning algorithms.

Khalil Al-Sulbi, Abdulaziz Attaallah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khalil Al-SulbiDepartment of Computers, Al-Qunfudah Engineering and Computing College, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia. kasulbi@uqu.edu.sa.
Abdulaziz AttaallahDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the software development, high impact on diverse industries are expanding at a fast pace. Early defect fixation and adjustment according to needs are essential to increase the performance, accuracy, durability and reliability of the software. Machine Learning (ML) approaches have used to analyze the Software Requirement (SR) in software development offer a great way to accelerate symmetric development and defect correction, especially because software failures are unpredictable. This research utilizes classification and regression-based models like Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Adaptive Moment Estimation (AME) to forecast bug resolving times from applicable asymmetric data attributes. ML models are used to predict defect resolution and feature completion time. The data takes into consideration several stages including issue detection, testing, and validation. The outcome of ML models, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) algorithm has an accuracy of 66% but the proposed approach of RF, ANN, and ADE illustrates an astonishing 98% accuracy. The dataset with symmetric attributes has trends and strong correlations. The proposed model result is better than other available software failure time prediction in terms of precision and accuracy, providing a sound to defect solution and prediction in SR.

Indexed as

Bug PredictionClassificationKNNRegressionSoftware development

Identifiers

PMID41174219
PMCPMC12579203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.