Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174218›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning to predict the role of CHWs in shifting birth preferences away from homebirth in India.

Moumita Mukherjee, Chetan Harshal Tote, Anuj Batta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Moumita MukherjeeCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. moumita.mukherjee@charite.de.
Chetan Harshal ToteDepartment of Business, University of Europe for Applied Sciences, Potsdam, Germany.
Anuj BattaPlenary HR, Noida, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study utilized well-known supervised machine learning algorithms to NFHS‑5 data of West Bengal, India, to predict the place of birth (home vs facility) by integrating CHW (community health worker) contact factors and women participant's perceptions about intimate partner violence (IPV). Although the study applied modelling techniques from conventional ML literature, the overarching contribution was identifying avenues to enhance public health policy response (e.g., efficient targeting of home visits and counselling by ANM/ASHA). The study concludes that, identifying likely homebirth cases among women with IPV-related poor perceptions applying improved prediction can enhance prioritising of CHW-contact and alter birth preference. The study improves minority-class learning using SMOTE on weighted NFHS data keeping in mind the complex survey design and SMOTE limitations. With respect to the ML model performance, Random Forest produced the highest test AUC (0.991) and accuracy (96.7%) among the 5 evaluated classifiers-LR (base), RF, MNB, k-NN, SVM and 0.950 with stable accuracy of 96% on hold-out data. The study does not bring methodological novelty in the underlying algorithms but generated actionable insights for equitable CHW allocation for efficient targeting using standard cross-sectional survey data.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersHome ChildbirthMachine LearningAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansIndiaPregnancyYoung AdultCommunity health workersHome birthMachine learningMaternal health

Identifiers

PMID41174218
PMCPMC12578857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.