ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning to predict the role of CHWs in shifting birth preferences away from homebirth in India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leakage-Controlled and Survey-Weighted Machine Learning for Neonatal Mortality Risk Prediction Using NFHS-5 Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study utilized well-known supervised machine learning algorithms to NFHS‑5 data of West Bengal, India, to predict the place of birth (home vs facility) by integrating CHW (community health worker) contact factors and women participant's perceptions about intimate partner violence (IPV). Although the study applied modelling techniques from conventional ML literature, the overarching contribution was identifying avenues to enhance public health policy response (e.g., efficient targeting of home visits and counselling by ANM/ASHA). The study concludes that, identifying likely homebirth cases among women with IPV-related poor perceptions applying improved prediction can enhance prioritising of CHW-contact and alter birth preference. The study improves minority-class learning using SMOTE on weighted NFHS data keeping in mind the complex survey design and SMOTE limitations. With respect to the ML model performance, Random Forest produced the highest test AUC (0.991) and accuracy (96.7%) among the 5 evaluated classifiers-LR (base), RF, MNB, k-NN, SVM and 0.950 with stable accuracy of 96% on hold-out data. The study does not bring methodological novelty in the underlying algorithms but generated actionable insights for equitable CHW allocation for efficient targeting using standard cross-sectional survey data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.