Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174216›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Ultrasound-measured optic nerve sheath diameter as a non-invasive tool for screening elevated-pressure from normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a cross-sectional study.

Jianhuan Wen, Lu Zhang, Xing Yang, Yixiang Mo, Shizhong Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yuqing Zeng, Lijie Gao, Yanwu Guo, Tao Xie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jianhuan WenNeurosurgery Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lu ZhangNeurosurgery Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xing YangNeurosurgery Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yixiang MoNeurosurgery Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shizhong ZhangNeurosurgery Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu ZhangZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuqing ZengZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lijie GaoZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 981606658@qq.com.
Yanwu GuoNeurosurgery Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. eguoyanwu@163.com.
Tao XieNeurosurgery Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. jessie0860@sina.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-measured optic nerve sheath diameter (US-ONSD) in distinguishing elevated-pressure hydrocephalus from normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NP-HCP), with the aim of establishing clinically relevant ONSD thresholds for screening and confirming elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in clinical practice. This cross-sectional study, conducted at the Neurosurgery Center of Zhujiang Hospital, included patients diagnosed with hydrocephalus. Standardized US-ONSD measurements were performed on all participants, followed by lumbar puncture (LP) to measure ICP. The diagnostic accuracy of US-ONSD measurements was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, focusing on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A 2 × 2 contingency table was used to determine the optimal ONSD thresholds for screening and confirming elevated ICP. A total of 42 hydrocephalus patients were included in this study: 22 patients with elevated-pressure hydrocephalus and 20 with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. The mean ONSD was significantly higher in the elevated-pressure group compared to the normal-pressure group (5.60 mm vs. 4.70 mm, p < 0.001). The overall cohort had a mean age of 53.6 years (SD 15.7), with 20 males (47.6%). The average weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were 59.0 kg (SD 9.8), 163.2 cm (SD 7.3), and 22.1 kg/m² (SD 3.2), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.957, 95% CI: 0.888-1.000). The optimal ONSD thresholds for excluding elevated ICP were 4.82 mm (NPV = 1), and for confirming elevated ICP were 5.75 mm (PPV = 1), thereby maximizing sensitivity and specificity. US-ONSD is a reliable, non-invasive method for detecting elevated ICP in patients with hydrocephalus. We propose two ONSD threshold values for clinical application: 4.82 mm for excluding elevated ICP and 5.75 mm for confirming it. These thresholds provide a practical and effective approach for screening and confirming elevated ICP, particularly in scenarios where invasive procedures, such as lumbar puncture, are not feasible or are contraindicated. Further multi-center studies are needed to validate these thresholds and optimize their clinical utility.

Indexed as

Hydrocephalus, Normal PressureIntracranial HypertensionOptic NerveAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHydrocephalusIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal PunctureUltrasonographyElevated-pressure hydrocephalusIntracranial pressureNon-invasive diagnosticsNon-obstructive hydrocephalusNormal-pressure hydrocephalusOptic nerve sheath diameterUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.