ArticleScientific reports2025
Sustainable production of 3D concrete printing using agricultural waste fibers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anisotropic Behavior of 3D-Printed Concrete: Interlayer Bonding, Pore Architecture, Reinforcement Limitations, and Durability Mechanisms.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the feasibility of using bio-waste materials as natural fibers in printability and flexural properties of 3D concrete printing (3DCP). Two sections of small- and large-scale experimental programs were conducted using natural fibers erived from bio-waste of date palm, cob skin, banana, pineapple leaf, and coconut fibers with different volume fractions of 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2%, and 0.25%. Different tests were conducted in the small-scale program, including flowability, extrudability, buildability, open time, compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural strength. After achieving an optimum percentage of natural fibers, 3DCP beams were tested under flexural loading. The optimum fiber volume fraction of 0.2% was determined through an experimental program evaluating fresh and mechanical properties, balancing enhanced strength with printability. Findings showed that using recycled bio-fibers enhanced the strength of both cast and 3DCP samples. Incorporating 0.2% by volume of date palm, cob skin, banana, pineapple leaf, or coconut fibers individually led to average increases of 26% in compressive strength, 40% in tensile strength, and 20% in flexural strength, and an average decrease of 10% in flowability and 8% in extrudability compared to mixtures devoid of fibers. Furthermore, the fibers contributed to maintaining the shape and stability of the printed filaments-nonetheless, higher fiber content impaired flowability and extrudability. Future research could explore hybrid fiber systems, advanced additives, and long-term durability to further enhance the sustainability and scalability of fiber-reinforced 3DCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.