Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174129›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026

Forensically important blow flies exhibit no nocturnal activity under LED streetlights.

Edward B Mondor, Breana R Manning, Gillian L Johnson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward B MondorDepartment of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, 30458, USA. emondor@georgiasouthern.edu.
Breana R ManningDepartment of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, 30458, USA.
Gillian L JohnsonDepartment of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, 30458, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicolegal forensic entomology relies largely on blow fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) activity to estimate a minimum postmortem interval (mPMI). The prevailing assumption, that blow flies are inactive at night, leads to the exclusion of nocturnal colonization from mPMI estimates. Artificial light at night (ALAN), however, especially from the increasing use of light emitting diode (LED) streetlights, may alter this innate behavior. Baited traps were deployed at two sites: one natural site that was dark at night (unlit) and one undeveloped but with infrastructure site that was LED-illuminated at night (lit). Samples were collected during daytime and nighttime periods. A total of 1,544 blow flies representing seven species were collected. Only six flies (0.4% of the total) were captured at night, four in unlit and two in lit environments, indicating minimal nighttime activity. These results suggest that, under current conditions, ALAN is unlikely to induce nocturnal blow fly behavior and impact mPMI estimations. Further research across diverse taxa and environments is needed to better understand the effects of ALAN on insects of forensic importance.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCalliphoridaeDipteraFeeding BehaviorLightLightingAnimalsCircadian RhythmForensic EntomologyPostmortem ChangesALANArtificial light at nightCalliphoridaeForensic entomologyNocturnal activity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.