Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174122›Full record

ArticleOecologia2025

Supplementary winter feeding is associated with higher recruitment rates in a population of a scavenging bird of prey.

C Nebel, I Penttinen, T Laaksonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C NebelDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. carina.nebel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-1676
I PenttinenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7674-7619
T LaaksonenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-7131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supplementary feeding is a widely used conservation strategy to support scavenging species, but the full effects remain poorly understood. In the Baltic Sea region, the recovery of the white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) was assisted by an extensive feeding scheme. We examined whether the individual usage of a feeder was associated with the probability to recruit into the local population. At a feeder in Southwest Finland, food was offered during winter, and visiting individuals were identified based on their unique ring codes. In addition, we identified individuals by genotypes extracted from feathers collected from ringed nestlings and from adult feathers collected from nests between 2003 and 2012 and 2008 and 2023, respectively. By matching nestling and adult genotypes, we infer recruitment and relate it to feeder usage. In addition, we explore sex-specific differences, which could arise due to intra-specific competition due to size differences. Our findings reveal that there was high individual variability in feeder usage and that visitation rate was positively associated with the probability to recruit. Although females spent more time at the feeder, recruitment was irrespective of sex. While for individuals the probability to recruit increased from 13.6% to 43.0%, the population-level increases were small, from 13.6% to 14.7%. We demonstrate that winter feeding had the potential to aid the recovery of the white-tailed eagle in the region, although estimating the full effect of supplementary food for the population would require further analyses. Our study highlights the consequences of supplementary feeding and facilitates more informed management strategies for the conservation of endangered species.

Indexed as

EaglesFeeding BehaviorAnimalsFemaleFinlandMalePredatory BehaviorSeasonsAnthropogenic stressorsConservation management strategiesPopulation dynamicsScavenging raptorsSettlementSex-specific foraging

Identifiers

PMID41174122
PMCPMC12578676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.