Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174121›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An integrated neutrosophic Z-numbers based CRITIC-EDAS decision model for smart solar panel evaluation in sustainable energy planning.

Muhammad Zafar Abbas, Rukhshanda Anjum, Amir Hussain, Mohaira Ahmad, Izatmand Haleemzai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Zafar Abbas *Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Lahore, 53710, Pakistan.
Rukhshanda Anjum *Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Lahore, 53710, Pakistan.
Amir Hussain *Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Lahore, 53710, Pakistan.
Mohaira Ahmad *School of Management Sciences, Beaconhouse National University, Lahore, 54890, Pakistan.
Izatmand Haleemzai *Department of Mathematics, Kabul Polytechnic University, Kabul, 2496300, Afghanistan. izatmandh@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise of environmental concerns, the transition to sustainable energy has become an international priority. Solar energy has emerged as the most eco-friendly source of renewable energy. Solar panels are crucial to this transition for the successful deployment of solar energy technologies. Given the long-term investment, selecting optimal solar panels remains challenging due to imprecision and subjectivity in real-world decision-making. To solve this problem, this article proposes a novel multi-criteria decision-making approach for the optimal selection of smart solar panels, that is, neutrosophic Z-numbers criteria importance through intercriteria correlation evaluation based on distance from average solution (CRITIC-EDAS). The neutrosophic Z-numbers (NZN) provide a potent mathematical structure for managing uncertainty by integrating truth, indeterminacy, and falsity with reliability factors. The main contribution of this paper is to apply the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) in a NZN environment and an alternative evaluation method called evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). The CRITIC determines the objective weighting of the criteria, and the EDAS ranks the alternatives. A real-world case study is conducted for Turpan, one of the hottest and most solar energy-intensive cities in China, to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach with NZN. The perceptions of three expert decision makers are integrated to evaluate and rank the alternatives to solar panels concerning several pertinent design criteria. In addition, the accuracy and reliability of the proposed model are checked by conducting sensitivity and comparative analyses.

Indexed as

Green technology assessmentMulti-criteria decision-makingNeutrosophic Z-numbersRenewable energy planningSmart solar panel selectionSolar energySustainable energy

Identifiers

PMID41174121
PMCPMC12578886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.