ArticleScientific reports2025
An integrated neutrosophic Z-numbers based CRITIC-EDAS decision model for smart solar panel evaluation in sustainable energy planning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rise of environmental concerns, the transition to sustainable energy has become an international priority. Solar energy has emerged as the most eco-friendly source of renewable energy. Solar panels are crucial to this transition for the successful deployment of solar energy technologies. Given the long-term investment, selecting optimal solar panels remains challenging due to imprecision and subjectivity in real-world decision-making. To solve this problem, this article proposes a novel multi-criteria decision-making approach for the optimal selection of smart solar panels, that is, neutrosophic Z-numbers criteria importance through intercriteria correlation evaluation based on distance from average solution (CRITIC-EDAS). The neutrosophic Z-numbers (NZN) provide a potent mathematical structure for managing uncertainty by integrating truth, indeterminacy, and falsity with reliability factors. The main contribution of this paper is to apply the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) in a NZN environment and an alternative evaluation method called evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). The CRITIC determines the objective weighting of the criteria, and the EDAS ranks the alternatives. A real-world case study is conducted for Turpan, one of the hottest and most solar energy-intensive cities in China, to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach with NZN. The perceptions of three expert decision makers are integrated to evaluate and rank the alternatives to solar panels concerning several pertinent design criteria. In addition, the accuracy and reliability of the proposed model are checked by conducting sensitivity and comparative analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.