ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025
Virginity Control and Hymen (re)Construction: Gender Analysis from the Perspective of Young Women.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virginity is a social construct with no medical or scientific value. Although some people believe an intact hymen is proof of virginity, this belief has not been confirmed using forensic evidence. Despite these facts, in many places in the world women's sexuality is controlled via virginity testing and hymen (re)constructions. These practices are on the rise globally, including in Sweden. Voicing the viewpoints of racialised women are rare. Using a gender perspective, this study analysed how young women living in Sweden who experience patriarchal chastity norms construct and understand virginity and what conditions, actions, and consequences follow when virginity is highly valued. A total of 14 young women originating from countries in the Middle East, East Africa, and Sweden were interviewed. This study uses constructive grounded theory to explore concepts such as oppression, inequality, and injustice. The category Unequal sexual conditions for women compared with men describes why virginity is understood as a troublesome condition for women. The category The making and faking of a virgin presents various ways women's sexuality is controlled in cultural and medical contexts. The consequences of the intrusions of medicine and the roles physicians play are included in the category Surgical interventions in gendered bodies. The emergent core category, Intersecting dimensions of honor cultures, (un)medical power, and gender injustice sustain the norms of virginity, explains how the epistemologies of ignorance are connected to virginity and the hymen. Unscientific discourses about virginity testing and the hymen (re)construction must be challenged if we intend to stop these harmful practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.