ArticleScientific reports2025
Ecotoxicity assessment and detection of antimicrobial compounds in urban environments and AMR hotspots.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incorporating a Screening-Level Risk Quotient (RQ_screen) for Assessing Human Health Risk of Pharmaceutical Residues in Consumption Water.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Removal of Contaminants of Emerging Concern from Wastewater Using Photocatalytic Membranes: Current Status and Challenges.Membranes · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental pollution by antimicrobial compounds poses a serious threat to aquatic ecosystems and human health due to their persistence and ability to promote antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study evaluated the presence of five widely used antibiotics in surface water, groundwater, and wastewater treatment plant effluents from 28 locations in Bengaluru and Mysuru, India: erythromycin, amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim. With concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 20.19 µg/L, ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole were identified at almost every site. High-risk levels (RQ > 1) were found at 23 sites for sulfamethoxazole, 22 for amoxicillin, and 21 for ciprofloxacin, according to risk quotient (RQ) analysis. Several sites showed cumulative high-risk exposure to multiple antibiotics. Low PNEC ENV/MIC ratios were also found at many sites by AMR risk assessment, suggesting a high potential for resistance emergence and spread. In order to lower ecological and public health risks, these findings indicate at significant hotspots of contamination and emphasise the urgent need for enhanced wastewater treatment, focused pollution control measures, and regular monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.