Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174045›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The dynamic regenerative scaffold stenting and shielding hernia system for dissection-free, atraumatic hernioplasty. Results of an experimental animal study.

Giuseppe Amato, Giorgio Romano, Luca Cicero, Giovanni Cassata, Giuseppe Di Buono, Giorgio Romano, Vito Rodolico, Roberto Puleio, Antonino Agrusa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuseppe AmatoDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 129, Palermo, 90127, PA, Italy. amatomed@gmail.com.
Giorgio RomanoDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 129, Palermo, 90127, PA, Italy.
Luca CiceroCEMERIT-Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Sicily, Palermo, Italy.
Giovanni CassataCEMERIT-Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Sicily, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe Di BuonoDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 129, Palermo, 90127, PA, Italy.
Giorgio RomanoPostgraduate School of General Surgery, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Vito RodolicoDepartment PROMISE, Section Pathological Anatomy, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Roberto PuleioDepartment of Pathologic Anatomy and Histology, IZSS Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Antonino AgrusaDepartment of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 129, Palermo, 90127, PA, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional hernia repair using static flat meshes is often associated with complications casused by extensive dissection, implant fixation, and poor biological response. The Stenting & Shielding (S&S) Hernia System offers a novel solution designed for dissection-free, fixation-free hernia repair. The S&S Hernia System has been evaluated in a porcine model, focusing on procedural simplicity, device retention and regenerative properties. The experimental study involved 10 pigs, each implanted with two S&S devices. Follow-up assessments included ultrasound, laparoscopic examinations, and histological analyses over a period ranging from 4 weeks to 8 months post-implantation. The S&S Hernia System, made from medical-grade polypropylene-based thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), features a rayed 3D scaffold and an oval shield connected by a mast. Delivered and positioned intraabdominally without dissection, the device transforms into a self-retaining scaffold to obliterate the hernia defect. Primary outcomes included ease of delivery, visceral adhesion formation, and device retention, ensuring no dislocation. Secondary outcomes evaluated histological evidence of tissue regeneration, including the development of connective tissue, muscles, vessels, and nerves within the scaffold. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect tissue growth factors promoting regeneration of the abdominal wall's typical components. All 20 implanted devices remained securely in place without dislocation. Transient adhesion bands were observed in two shields at 1 month but resolved by 3 months. No visceral adhesions were detected at the time of animal sacrifice. Histological analyses demonstrated tissue regeneration within the scaffold, while immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of growth factors supporting regeneration. Overall, the S&S Hernia System showed promising results in a porcine model, with no dislocation and evident regenerative potential. Its rapid, dissection-free delivery and compliance with abdominal wall dynamics simplify the procedure while minimizing adhesions. These findings warrant further clinical investigation to validate its application in human patients.

Indexed as

HerniorrhaphyRegenerationStentsTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalSurgical MeshSwineAbdominal hernioplastyDissection freeHernia prosthesesLaparoscopic hernia repairPorcine experimental modelRegenerative scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID41174045
PMCPMC12579244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.