Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174043›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Neural evidence for the effects of behavioral memory updating following fear conditioning.

Inge Timmers, Emma E Biggs, Lauren C Heathcote, Mats Fredrikson, Daniel S Pine, Johan W S Vlaeyen, David Borsook, Laura E Simons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Inge TimmersDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Emma E BiggsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Lauren C HeathcoteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Mats FredriksonDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Daniel S PineEmotion and Development Branch, NIMH-Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Johan W S VlaeyenResearch group Experimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
David BorsookCenter for Pain and the Brain, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura E SimonsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. lesimons@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3395-9483

Funding

Fear learning in adolescents with chronic pain: Neural and behavioral mechanismsR01HD083270 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SIMONS, LAURA E · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
Mentoring and Research in Biobehavioral Aspects of Pediatric PainK24AR078945 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LAURA E SIMONS · 2022 to 2026
$970k
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR078945NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083270U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01HD083270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure therapy for the treatment of pain-related disability relies on extinction learning, forming new safety memories inhibiting fear expression. However, fear often returns. The behavioral memory updating hypothesis posits that a fear memory can be 'updated' to a safe memory while in a malleable state, preventing return-of-fear. To test this hypothesis, 78 adolescents with and without chronic pain (age: Mean=15 y, range=10-24 y) were recruited for a two-day neuroimaging study. Due to incomplete data/excess motion, 55 participants (pain=38; pain-free=17) were included in MRI data analysis. Participants underwent a fear conditioning protocol with a within-subjects 'updating' manipulation: one CS+ (CS+Reminded [CS+R]) was reactivated to achieve a malleable state before extinction, while a second (CS+Not Reminded [CS+NR]) was not. We observed significantly less functional connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the amygdala for the CS+R and CS- compared to the CS+NR, consistent with the purported change in neural circuitry underlying the 'updating' effect, however observed no credible difference in fear ratings between the CS+R and CS+NR. This discrepancy may be crucial to understanding the mixed findings in the field and indicates that while some form of 'updating' may occur, it may be insufficient to reduce reported fear.

Identifiers

PMID41174043
PMCPMC12578629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.