ArticleCommunications chemistry2025
Membrane-based nanopurification for plastic recycling.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tackling the global plastic pollution crisis.National science review · 2026Review
- Continuous-Flow Conversion of Waste Polystyrene Into Styrene Monomers Utilizing the Microwave-Concentration Effect on Spherical Activated Carbon.ChemSusChem · 2026Article
- Graphene Oxide Membranes for Sustainable Recycling: Poly(styrene) Fractionation by Organic Solvent Nanofiltration.ACS engineering Au · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purification technologies that remove contaminants from waste plastics are critical to increasing plastic recyclability. Mechanical recycling cannot remove embedded additives, dissolution methods are limited by additive-polymer compatibility and chemical recycling requires strict control of contamination to prevent undesired reactions. This work introduces a membrane-based size-exclusion process that exploits a key property of plastics: polymer molecules typically have a molecular weight significantly higher than that of common additives. A case study using ceramic tubular ultrafiltration membranes demonstrates removal of over 90% of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) from both virgin and post-consumer polystyrene, while also eliminating polymer tailings originating from degraded polymer chains. By targeting the size difference between polymers and additives, this approach opens new opportunities for regeneration of plastics and offers a pathway to broader recyclability. Applied to common plastics such as PE, PP, PS, PVC, and PU, this framework could increase the fraction of recycled plastics from ~9% to over 68.5%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.