Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41174030›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

No effect of preliminarily simulated cathodal HD-tDCS on the frontopolar cortex in the exploration-exploitation task.

Viktor Timokhov, Andrey Timashkov, Oksana Zinchenko

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Viktor TimokhovZurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. viktor.timokhov@econ.uzh.ch.
Andrey TimashkovCentre for Cognition and Decision-Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Oksana ZinchenkoCentre for Cognition and Decision-Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the causal role of the human frontopolar cortex (FPC) in managing counterfactual strategies during decision-making under uncertainty. Using a combination of cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) and computational modeling, we examined how cathodal stimulation, preliminarily simulated with SimNIBS, affects the retrieval of alternative strategies in the task that constantly provokes exploration-exploitation dilemmas. A comparison of resting-state recordings with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) before and after stimulation did not reveal any physiological effect of HD-tDCS. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in participants' exploratory behavior between the sham and cathodal groups. These results indicate that the employed HD-tDCS protocol may not sufficiently influence FPC function, despite preliminary tDCS simulations with SimNIBS, calling for further refinement of the HD-tDCS protocol used in future research to elucidate the causal role of the FPC in decision-making under uncertainty.

Indexed as

Decision MakingExploratory BehaviorFrontal LobePrefrontal CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredUncertaintyYoung AdultExploration-exploitationfNIRSModelingtDCS

Identifiers

PMID41174030
PMCPMC12578884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.