Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41173997›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Politicians pose left but the voter is always right.

Cassandra L Baragar, Lorin J Elias, Austen K Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cassandra L BaragarDepartment of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, Canada.
Lorin J EliasDepartment of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Austen K SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, Canada. austen.smith@uregina.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2211-344X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asymmetry in the perception and expression of emotions in the brain can be observed in the cheek presented in a portrait. The left cheek is more often put forward in an emotional photo, but the context of the portrait is important as leftward posing is attenuated in more serious settings. Similarly, leftward posed portraits are perceived as more emotionally expressive. However, there has not been an investigation into how the perception of left and right poses impacts vote choice. We predicted that, when tasked with identifying the portrait they would vote for and the portrait that appeared more friendly, participants would vote for individuals presenting the right cheek and find those individuals showing the left cheek more friendly. Participants' scores indicated more left cheek poses were selected for friendliness and more right cheek poses for voting, with a significant difference found between the conditions. We predicted that more right cheek poses would emerge when a sample of elected officials' portraits were examined. To the contrary, we found a disconnect with participant vote choice as politicians more frequently presented their left cheek, suggesting that it might be time for politicians to put their right cheek forward.

Indexed as

EmotionsPoliticsAdultCheekFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansMaleVotingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41173997
PMCPMC12578780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.