Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41173980›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimum incision geometry in side-to-side anastomosis.

Kourosh Hasanpour, Sepehr Mirlohi, Sadegh Dehghani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kourosh HasanpourDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. hasanpour@eng.ui.ac.ir.
Sepehr MirlohiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Sadegh DehghaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the use of a saphenous vein (SV) graft to the left anterior descending (LAD) artery is prevalent. While end-to-side anastomosis (ESA) is considered standard practice, several studies have highlighted the effectiveness of side-to-side anastomosis (SSA). Optimizing the cross-sectional geometry is one of the factors influencing the success of the anastomosis. Among the possible configurations, an elliptical cross-section is the most suitable option because of its smooth perimeter and its ability to prevent stress concentration. The optimal diameter ratio for this elliptical cross-section can be determined through an optimization process. This study investigated the impact of punch geometry on the side-to-side anastomosis (SSA) at a 90-degree grafting angle, specifically examining the residual stress and strain caused by the grafting of two arteries. The analysis was conducted both without and under blood pressure at the junction and considered different ratios of elliptical punch diameters. According to the simulation results, the lowest residual stress and the lowest stress induced by blood pressure occur at the junction of the two arteries when using an elliptical punch with a larger diameter ratio in the circumferential direction of the LAD.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalCoronary Artery BypassCoronary VesselsSaphenous VeinHumansStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID41173980
PMCPMC12578927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.