ArticleScientific reports2025
Knowledge and practices regarding infection control precautions against blood-borne diseases among recovered HCV patients in Egypt.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Awareness of hepatitis C knowledge among four high-risk populations in Xiamen, China: a cross-sectional study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preventing Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) reinfection is vital for the long-term health of recovered patients. This cross-sectional study evaluated the knowledge and practices related to blood-borne disease infection control among 376 HCV-recovered individuals in Egypt. Participants had a median age of 63 years, 81.9% were males, 56.1% were manual workers, 6.9% were healthcare professionals, 67.6% had basic literacy, and only 47.9% had received the hepatitis B vaccine. Non-healthcare participants had significantly poorer knowledge and practices compared to healthcare professionals (p < 0.001). Both groups showed suboptimal levels, with 19.2% of healthcare professionals and 0.3% of non-healthcare participants demonstrating good knowledge, while good practices were observed in 23.0% and 14.3% of each group, respectively. A significant positive correlation existed between knowledge and practice (r = 0.363, p < 0.001). Higher education (p < 0.01) and the HBV vaccination status (p = 0.004) were associated with better knowledge. Higher education correlated with better practices (p < 0.05). Individuals in manual labor had lower knowledge and practice scores (p = 0.012 and p = 0.001, respectively). These findings underscore significant knowledge and practice deficits, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to improve infection control and sustain the success of Egypt national HCV treatment program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.