ArticleScientific reports2025
Dynamic affective stimulation modulates visual but not auditory prospective timing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are highly accurate in their temporal judgements, yet their estimations could be susceptible to several biases. It is found that fear-evoking situations are associated with elevated orienting reaction, enabling more pulses to be registered and stored at the accumulator. However, the effect of state anxiety on time perception remains unresolved. Additionally, only a few studies to date have explored whether the influence of emotions on perceived time is modality dependent. To address these gaps, the current mixed-design aimed to explore the influence of anxiety-inducing real-life events on time perception across visual and auditory sensory modalities. Participants in each modality group completed three temporal bisection tasks in total, interspersed with two affective film clips (i.e., videos with elevated and reduced anxiety) in a random order. Although anxiety induction successfully increased participants' physiological arousal, a temporal lengthening effect was prominent after both types of manipulation across modalities, due to increased switch width in the visual group, as audition's advantage was immune to affective stimulation. The lengthening effect was accompanied by increased parasympathetic activation, pointing to the existence of two distinct attention-related mechanisms. As such, the temporal expansion we observed could constitute a contextually driven cognitive mechanism that facilitates individuals' homeostasis, while being modality dependent. Finally, our findings demonstrate the predictive value of physiological signals on altered timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.