ArticleScientific reports2025
The role of amygdala reactivity in affective fluctuations across social contexts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The amygdala plays a critical role in socio-emotional processing, serving not only as a key neural substrate for shaping emotional experiences and social behavior, but also as a trait-like individual risk factor that confers heightened vulnerability to emotional disorders, including anxiety and depression. While prior research has primarily examined the link between heightened amygdala reactivity and negative affect (NA), much less is known about its relationship with positive affect (PA), particularly across different social contexts. In this study, we focused on how these associations vary based on the level of social intimacy and distinct facets of affect (e.g., high vs. low-arousal PA). Using a combined fMRI and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) approach, we examined how individual differences in amygdala reactivity relate to momentary emotional experiences across diverse social contexts in daily life. As expected, interactions with close companions had a robust mood-enhancing effect. Notably, individual differences in amygdala reactivity moderated the association between social context and high-arousal PA, such that individuals with heightened amygdala reactivity reported lower levels of high-arousal PA when alone, compared to when they were with close others. These findings highlight the specific social contexts and affective states most relevant to individual differences in amygdala reactivity, offering novel insights into the dynamic interplay between brain function, emotional experiences, and social contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.