Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41173962›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multistage feature selection and stacked generalization model for cancer detection.

Sulekha Das, Avijit Kumar Chaudhuri, Sayak Das, Partha Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sulekha DasResearch Scholar, Information Technology, GCECT, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Avijit Kumar ChaudhuriComputer Science & Engineering, Brainware University, Kolkata - 125, Barasat, West Bengal, India. c.avijit@gmail.com.
Sayak DasStudent, M.Tech, Computer Science & Engineering, Brainware University, Kolkata -125, Barasat, West Bengal, India.
Partha GhoshAssistant Professor Computer Science and Engineering, GCECT, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the issue of reliable cancer screening, this study proposes a novel approach to select key features in conjunction with a stacking classifier. It reduces the number of features required while maintaining the same diagnostic accuracy. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method yields superior performance in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, precision, specificity, and AUC on each benchmark dataset. This stacked model, built from Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree and a Multilayer Perceptron as meta-classifier, achieves 100% accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC using the selected optimal feature subsets. The findings confirm that intelligent feature selection helps models perform better and is easier to use in identification of cancer.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsAlgorithmsBayes TheoremDecision TreesHumansLogistic ModelsSensitivity and SpecificityBreast CancerCancer detectionFeature selectionHybrid Filter-WrapperLung CancerStacked classifierStacked generalization

Identifiers

PMID41173962
PMCPMC12579239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.