ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-feature deep learning framework for predicting CO adsorption mechanisms at metal oxide interfaces: a transformer-based approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Concept of 2D van der Waals Nanohybrids for Key Biomedical Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel multi-feature deep learning framework that integrates Transformer architecture with readily computable molecular descriptors to predict CO adsorption mechanisms at single metal oxide interfaces. The framework employs specialized encoders for structural, electronic, and kinetic descriptors, utilizing cross-feature attention mechanisms to capture the multifaceted nature of catalytic processes. Unlike traditional approaches requiring expensive DFT calculations, our method uses empirical descriptors and pre-computed parameters that can be rapidly obtained for practical catalyst screening applications. Comprehensive evaluation across seven distinct metal oxide systems demonstrates superior performance over traditional machine learning methods, achieving mean absolute errors below 0.12 eV for adsorption energy prediction and correlation coefficients exceeding 0.92. Systematic ablation studies reveal the hierarchical importance of different data modalities, with structural information providing the most critical contribution. Case studies on CeO₂, TiO₂, and ZnO validate the model's capability to distinguish material-specific mechanisms and provide mechanistic insights consistent with experimental observations. The multi-feature approach successfully predicts coverage-dependent effects, surface termination influences, and defect-mediated processes, establishing a foundation for data-driven catalyst design and mechanism elucidation in sustainable catalysis applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.