Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41173948›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A comprehensive framework for solution space exploration in community detection.

Fabio Morea, Domenico De Stefano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabio MoreaArea Science Park, Padriciano 99, Trieste, Italy.
Domenico De StefanoUniversity of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1, Trieste, Italy. ddestefano@units.it.

Funding

This work has been granted by the PRIN project "Models and methods for the analysis of collaboration networks", CUP J53D23011540006, Principal Investigator (PI) prof. Domenico De Stefano. The volume/publication has been produced with co-funding from the European Union - Next Generation EU. CUP J53D23011540006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community detection algorithms are essential tools for understanding complex networks, yet their results often vary between runs and are affected by node input order and the presence of outliers, undermining reproducibility and interpretation. This paper addresses these issues by introducing a framework for systematic exploration of the solution space, obtained through repeated runs of a given algorithm with permuted node orders. A Bayesian model assesses convergence, estimates solution probabilities, and provides a defensible stopping rule that balances accuracy and computational cost. Building on this process, we propose a taxonomy of solution spaces that offers clear diagnostics of partition reliability across algorithms and a shared vocabulary for interpretation. Applied to a real-world network, the approach shows that different algorithms produce various types of solution space, highlighting the importance of systematic exploration of the solutions before drawing scientific conclusions.

Indexed as

Community detectionHorizon project networksNetwork analysisOutliersSolution space

Identifiers

PMID41173948
PMCPMC12578937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.