ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and application of a deep learning-based tuberculosis diagnostic assistance system in remote areas of Northwest China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Kashgar region, located in Northwest China, has a significantly higher incidence of tuberculosis (TB) compared to the national average. Local governments conduct annual TB screening using medical imaging. However, due to a shortage of radiologists, insufficient diagnostic capabilities, low levels of informatization, and reliance on manual processes in primary healthcare institutions, traditional medical imaging methods for TB screening suffer from low efficiency, high rates of misdiagnosis, and missed diagnoses. To develop a deep learning-based TB diagnostic assistance system tailored to local conditions, addressing the shortcomings of primary healthcare institutions, improving TB screening efficiency, and reducing misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis rates. We collected chest X-ray images from 10,897 patients across multiple centers, with 10,002 cases used for training and 895 cases for testing. We trained a TB-UNET model and developed a TB diagnostic assistance system based on this model, deploying it in 12 counties and 178 township hospitals in the Kashgar region. The system enhanced the informatization of primary healthcare institutions. In clinical testing, Radiologists' sensitivity in diagnosing TB increased by 11.8% (from 62.7% [95% CI 58.2-67.1%] to 74.5% [95% CI 70.3-78.4%], p < 0.001), accuracy improved by 2.8% (from 87.2% [95% CI 85.1-89.1%] to 90.0% [95% CI 88.2-91.6%], p = 0.023), and the average time spent on reading images decreased from 38.83 s (95% CI 36.21-41.45 s) to 15.93 s (95% CI 14.32-17.54 s, p < 0.001). The system significantly enhanced TB screening efficiency in the Kashgar region, reducing misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis rates. It has high practical value and offers a replicable model for screening other infectious diseases in remote areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.