ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025
An interpretable machine learning model predicts the interactive and cumulative risks of different environmental chemical exposures on depression.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The hidden effects of metabolism-disrupting agents on alcohol-related liver disease risk: an integrated epidemiological, machine learning, and network toxicology Analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans are exposed to a multitude of environmental chemical mixtures (ECMs) in daily life that may influence depression risk. While prior studies have shown individual ECM exposures to depression, the cumulative and interactive effects of multiple co-exposures remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict depression risk from ECMs and reveal their interactions mediated through endogenous metabolites and proteins. Using NHANES 2011-2016 data, we analyzed serum and urinary ECMs from 1333 adults, with depression assessed via PHQ-9 scores. Nine ML models were evaluated, with a random forest model showing the best performance (AUC: 0.967, and F1 score: 0.91) in predicting depression risk from ECM exposures. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) identified serum cadmium and cesium, and urinary 2-hydroxyfluorene as the most influential predictors among 52 ECMs. An individualized depression risk assessment model was developed based on SHAP values for key ECMs. Mediation network analysis implicated oxidative stress and inflammation as crucial pathways relating ECMs to depression. This study presents an interpretable ML approach for elucidating cumulative environmental risks for depression, advancing our understanding of complex chemical-health interactions and potentially informing targeted interventions and prevention strategies for depression related to environmental exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.