ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Head Vessel Reintervention Post-Type A Dissection Repair With a Hybrid Stent Prosthesis.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdverse aortic remodeling may occur after the repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), with branch vessel involvement being implicated due to retrograde perfusion of the false lumen (FL). CASE SUMMARY: A 61-year-old man presented with adverse aortic remodeling following ATAAD repair with the AMDS Hybrid Prosthesis, with maximal growth in zone 2 of 9 mm over 1 year. Tears were identified in the right common carotid artery and innominate artery, which were treated with endovascular stenting. There was no further growth in zones 0 to 3 three years postprocedure. DISCUSSION: This case demonstrates cessation in the progression of aortic degeneration following head vessel endovascular treatment. In aortic degeneration following ATAAD repair, branch vessel involvement should be considered for potential contributions to adverse remodeling. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Branch vessel involvement and endovascular intervention should be considered in cases of adverse aortic remodeling following ATAAD repair, potentially reducing the need for open reintervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.