Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41172558›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2026

Regulatory T cell approaches for graft-versus-host disease prevention.

Cameron S Bader, Everett H Meyer, Robert S Negrin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cameron S BaderDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Cellular Immune Tolerance Program, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Everett H MeyerDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Cellular Immune Tolerance Program, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Robert S NegrinDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Cellular Immune Tolerance Program, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: negrs@stanford.edu.

Funding

TUMOR SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTES IN BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATIONP01CA049605 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI David B. Miklos · 1989 to 2026
$73.3M
Engineered Immune Cells for T1DR01DK132549 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, EVERETT · 2022 to 2025
$3.1M
The regulation of innate immune sensors to control GVHD and GVL after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationK00CA245728 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BADER, CAMERON SCOTT · 2021 to 2024
$372k
High-resolution tracking of T cell differentiation to predict and control alloreactive diseaseK99HL179392 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Cameron Scott Bader · 2025 to 2026
$262k
NCI NIH HHS K00 CA245728NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049605NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL179392NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK132549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a rare subset of T cells that are potent regulators of the immune system. As a result, the use of Tregs to prevent undesired immune activation and to re-establish immune balance is an attractive cellular therapy approach. In hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), there has been significant interest in using Tregs to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which occurs when donor alloreactive T cells recognize recipient HLA- or other minor transplantation antigens as non-self. There is a critical unmet need for novel strategies to prevent GVHD since as many as 50% of patients will develop clinically significant GVHD with current therapies. Evidence from preclinical murine models and early-phase human studies suggests that an additional benefit to Treg cellular therapy in HCT is the apparent maintenance of pathogenic immunity and graft-versus-tumor effects, which are required to prevent leukemia relapse. While the major limiting factor for Treg-based therapies has been the rarity of these cells, novel methods to improve Treg isolation and expansion have demonstrated feasibility for implementation of these strategies in the clinic. Moreover, genetic engineering of Tregs has been shown to be a promising strategy to improve their specificity, longevity, and function. Clinical trials have established that such approaches are feasible and can be effective in both human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched and haplo-matched settings. In this review, we describe proposed mechanisms for Treg control of alloreactivity, modern methods for Treg isolation and expansion, the history of Treg clinical trials for GVHD prevention, and the horizon for Treg cellular therapy.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41172558
PMCPMC12638023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.