Observational studyCritical care science2025
Correlation of sonographic and radiographic scores of lung edema and metrics of shunt, dead space, and respiratory mechanics in invasively ventilated patients.
Observational study in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ten Influential Point-of-Care Ultrasound Papers: 2025 in Review.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the relationship between sonographic and radiological scores of lung edema with metrics of shunt, dead space, and respiratory mechanics in critically ill patients under invasive ventilation for greater than 24 hours.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study involving invasively ventilated critically ill patients. The radiographic assessment of lung edema score and the global lung ultrasound score were utilized to evaluate pulmonary edema. Measurements for assessing shunt and dead space included the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, ventilatory ratio, and corrected minute volume, respectively. Respiratory mechanics were assessed through dynamic respiratory system compliance, driving pressure, and mechanical power of ventilation.
resultsA total of 364 invasively ventilated patients were included; one-third of them were classified as having acute respiratory distress syndrome. Median radiographic assessment of lung edema and global lung ultrasound scores were 15 [8 to 20] and 7 [3 to 13], respectively. Both scores explained little of the variance in partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, ventilatory ratio, corrected minute volume, respiratory system compliance, driving pressure, and mechanical power (R2 = 0.05-0.12). Patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome exhibited a stronger association between the radiographic assessment of lung edema score and partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, as well as between the global lung ultrasound score and respiratory system compliance. In contrast, patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome demonstrated stronger associations between the radiographic assessment of lung edema score and mechanical power and between the global lung ultrasound score and dead space metrics. A positive interaction of positive end-expiratory pressure was found only for the association between partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio and the radiographic assessment of lung edema and global lung ultrasound scores.
conclusionThe radiographic assessment of lung edema score and the global lung ultrasound score poorly correlate with shunt, dead space, and respiratory mechanics metrics in invasively ventilated patients. A counterintuitive moderation effect of acute respiratory distress syndrome status is observed in some of these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.