ReviewBrazilian dental journal2025
Advances in clinical and translational research in endodontics: A comprehensive overview.
Review in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improbable healing in endodontics: a case series of favorable outcomes despite adverse prognostic conditions.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2025
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical and translational research play a decisive role in advancing evidence-based endodontics by bridging basic science with clinical applications. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and advances in clinical and translational research in Endodontics, addressing methodological foundations, diagnostic challenges, and emerging technologies. It highlights the importance of well-designed randomized controlled trials, robust outcome definitions, and the inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures. The integration of advanced imaging, particularly cone-beam computed tomography, has significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and treatment monitoring. Molecular biology techniques, including polymerase chain reaction and biomarker profiling, have expanded the understanding of endodontic microbiome, immune responses, and host factors related to treatment outcomes. Despite these advances, persistent limitations include diagnostic imprecision, lack of standardized criteria, and underutilization of biomarkers and omics data in clinical practice. The rise of precision dentistry, propelled by genomics, bioinformatics, and artificial intelligence, holds the potential to revolutionize endodontic care through personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Bridging existing gaps will require rigorous study designs, coordinated multicenter efforts, and the effective integration of molecular diagnostics, all of which are critical to advancing endodontic science and optimizing patient outcomes. Likewise, the full potential of translational science can be harnessed to reshape the future of endodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.