ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025
Biological mediators involved in tooth resorption following avulsion and delayed replantation: an experimental in vivo study.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the biological mediators involved in tooth resorption following permanent tooth avulsion and late replantation at various periods. Premolars of healthy dogs were extracted and divided into: Control Group (CG): negative control, sound teeth (n= 5 teeth / 10 roots); or kept dry and replanted after 20 min (G20): the teeth were replanted after 20 minutes of extraoral time in a dry environment (n= 5 teeth / 10 roots); 60 min (G60): the teeth were replanted after 60 minutes of extraoral time in a dry environment (n= 5); or 90 min (G90): the teeth were replanted after 90 minutes of extraoral time in a dry environment (n= 5 teeth / 10 roots). After this, the teeth were replanted and splinted with 0.4 mm nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) archwire. After 120 days, the animals were sacrificed, and the tissues were removed for histological processing. The slides were stained for microscopic analysis, submitted to tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) histoenzymology, and immunostained for RANK, RANKL, OPG, alkaline phosphatase, and periostin. Data obtained were submitted to statistical analysis at a 5% significance level. In areas of inflammatory resorption, TRAP + osteoclasts around the replanted teeth were identified, regardless of the duration of extra-alveolar time. RANKL synthesis in this region was more intense after keeping the tooth dry for 90 minutes when compared with other periods (p < 0.05). In areas of replacement resorption, there was less periostin synthesis and a higher level of alkaline phosphatase production (p < 0.05). Late replantation of avulsed teeth resulted in tooth resorption. Inflammatory resorption was characterized by osteoclast recruitment and RANKL synthesis and replacement resorption by alkaline phosphatase synthesis and inhibition of periostin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.