Observational studyRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Activities and repercussions of a course on Sustainable Development Goals with a focus on surveillance.
Observational study in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto describe the activities and repercussions of training course "Sustainable Development Goals with a focus on Surveillance of Noncommunicable Diseases and Injuries in the Legal Amazon".
methodsan observational and descriptive study. Thirty-six healthcare professionals from 14 municipalities in the state of Amapá, AP, Brazil participated. Preand post-tests and observations (non-participant) were applied.
resultsduring the course, welcoming activities and educational and theoretical practices were developed to improve participants' professional development. It was observed, both through responses to tests and through observations of activities, that professionals had greater difficulty in searching for evidence. Participants'level of general knowledge before in-person training was 77.31%, and increased to 80.56% after training. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: with the course, participants' level of general knowledge increased from regular to good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.