ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025
Development of a mobile application for urinary diary monitoring in overactive bladder management.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a mobile application for the management of overactive bladder by means of urinary diaries. The application was designed to enhance usability and user satisfaction, with the Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate model serving as the overarching systematic framework.
methodsThe Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate model guided the development process, starting with analyzing patient and professional needs. User-centered mockups were designed, leading to a functional prototype. The app was developed, tested through assigned tasks, and evaluated for usability using scales, qualitative data, and feedback.
resultsMost healthcare professionals and patients found the tasks "very easy" or "easy." Average completion times were 13 min for patients and 9 min for professionals. Participants gave positive feedback, describing the application as intuitive and easy to use. No critical errors were identified, and satisfaction levels were high.
conclusionThe mobile app showed high usability and user satisfaction, demonstrating its potential to enhance overactive bladder management and improve patient care efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.